A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR

“Sarah Snook’s terrifying thriller is an absolute pleasure to watch. This extraordinarily tight drama knits all its threads
together brilliantly.”

-The Guardian

“A gripping thriller. Sarah Snook pulls you right in. Michael Peña radiates sensitivity and weariness. Abby Elliott’s emotional
range, and rawness, matches that of Sarah Snook – and the same can be said of Sophia Lillis.”

-NPR

“Fanning and Snook are incredibly charismatic on screen together and both deliver powerful performances”

-Collider

_____

[READ] Sarah Snook On The Role That Pushed Her Back To Television

[LISTEN] Dakota Fanning Dives Into The Making Of “All Her Fault”

[WATCH] Go Behind The Scenes With The Creators And Artisans Of All Her Fault As They Unpack Adapting The Acclaimed Novel

_____

All episodes of ALL HER FAULT are streaming now, only on Peacock.

And now, the main event...

Twenty years after YouTube launched, Hollywood is still trying to figure out what to do about it. Over those
two decades, what began as a lo-fi website for user-generated content has become the largest threat to traditional TV as well as the streaming giants that grew up alongside it. The platform generates more than $60 billion in annual revenue, and is now home to NFL Sunday Ticket and the Oscars. Most recently, of course, YouTube-native content creators Kane Parsons, Curry Barker, and Mark Fischbach, among others, have crossed over to the
multiplex, evidence that the next generation of Hollywood talent is being minted far outside the studio system.

Everyone in town is trying to combat the 800-pound gorilla in their own way. Netflix has repurposed children’s content from Ms. Rachel and Daniel Coleman (Danny Go!) while ingesting big-ticket video podcasts from figures like Jay Shetty and Bill Simmons and a three-hour daily livestream from The
Breakfast Club’s Charlamagne tha God. (Sources at multiple data analytics firms told me it’s too soon to know whether these bets are working.) CAA is teaming up with TPG for a $250 million fund to invest in the future of YouTube talent, Bloomberg reports. (Usual disclosure: TPG is an investor
in Puck.) Meanwhile, Amazon Prime Video broke into the Nielsen streaming top 10 last year with Jimmy Donaldson’s Beast Games, although viewership has dropped off for the second season—and, at a reported $150 million a season, the deal is not cheap.

But licensing or poaching digital creators isn’t the only way to get ahead. Early last year, Fox Entertainment launched Fox Creator Studios with a very different mandate: Identify talent and develop I.P. that can be
platform agnostic. Billy Parks, a former Chernin Group executive, is running the accelerator program, which is focused on building new I.P. around digital projects across major platforms and formats, including Instagram, TikTok, and others. Projects will run the gamut from scripted, unscripted, and animated shows to podcasts.

A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR

For 51 seasons—and counting—Saturday Night Live has not only
entertained audiences, it has helped define what television can be. SNL delivers a variety show that blends sharp political satire, cultural commentary, live music and unforgettable comedy into a singular broadcast event. The long-running series has achieved something rare in the modern media landscape: remaining appointment viewing for generations of audiences. Season after season, Saturday Night Live maintains its cultural relevance while introducing new voices that
shape comedy for each era.

For Your Emmy^® Consideration in all eligible categories, including Outstanding Variety Series. Available Now on Peacock

Notably, the strategy doesn’t rely on simply licensing content for Fox’s owned-and-operated
platforms—although that’s also part of the deal—but investing real dollars into these other platforms where audiences don’t seem to want to leave. “We are not trying to drive people to any particular platform,” Parks told me. “We are giving capital to creators, and then sharing in the I.P. ownership, letting them publish where they have their relationship with their audience.”

Put more succinctly, Fox’s Creator Studios is focused on “making money on the internet,” Parks said, not
necessarily trying to compete with the internet. Creators can still keep content behind paywalls (like Patreon) if they choose, and collect AdSense dollars from YouTube. (Parks did not say how Fox’s revenue-sharing program works.) Parks acknowledged that convincing top creators to leave their original platforms and produce content for a streamer would ultimately defeat the purpose of working with those creators by essentially cutting them off from their audience. Drew
Rowny, who leads product at Patreon, agreed with the sentiment. “Growing your audience on one platform and owning or monetizing it elsewhere is an artifact of history,” he told me.

Indeed, many of today’s top creators are allergic to exclusivity. ESPN was never going to pry Pat McAfee away from YouTube, and Amazon couldn’t lock MrBeast into a traditional overall deal. In fact, when Prime Video first announced Beast Games, Donaldson appeared at the
upfronts alongside Neal Mohan to explicitly state that YouTube was home—even if he’d be monetizing his brand everywhere.

In many ways, the Fox Creator incubator is trying to bypass this dynamic by investing in talent earlier. According to Parks, Fox wants to help creators build their own audiences, not simply try to replatform audiences onto TV. “We are not uncomfortable with the lack of control,” he told me. On another level, however, the Creator program appears
to be attempting just that: attaining some control over the creative pipelines that operate independently of legacy media.

To its credit, Fox has always been open-minded when it comes to media strategy and acquisitions. Over the
past few years, the company has bought Tubi, TMZ, the Bento Box animation studio, Red Seat Ventures, Supercast, and has inked other forward-looking new media deals. Now, with Creator Studios, Fox is “trying to bridge YouTube internet culture with a very entrepreneurial culture here,” Parks told me. But it’s also true that for every creator that Parks & Co. manages to mint, YouTube will churn out 100 more—all while continuing to dominate the ad side of the equation.

Indeed, thanks to its
revenue-sharing business model, YouTube doesn’t need to invest anything in this next generation of superstars. These creators know a launchpad when they see one, and the platform itself doesn’t rely on standout shows to generate the majority of its engagement. To wit, YouTube’s top 100 channels (excluding Shorts) accounted for only about 6 percent of total viewing time last year, per Digital i, although it continues investing in premium content to secure top-tier CTV ad
dollars.

Fox seems to have realized that you can’t beat YouTube at its own game, so you might as well invest in creator talent to capture some of the upside. The data supports the strategy: In a recent Harris poll produced with Tubi that surveyed 2,500 U.S. adults who stream at least one hour a week, nearly 70 percent of respondents said they prefer creators to traditional entertainment, with nearly 80 percent saying they want new creator content from their favorite personalities without
having to pay for it. At the same time, less than 40 percent of respondents said they were interested in older videos from their favorite creators moving over to other streaming services. That puts companies like Netflix, Disney, and Amazon in a bind—but Fox, rather savvily, navigates around the problem entirely.

Alas, it’s still too early to know whether the best strategy is to partner with YouTube, compete with YouTube, or develop native YouTube talent. But the winning formula is
probably some combination of all three. For my money, the safest option would be to hitch a ride on the YouTube bullet train rather than try to stand athwart the tracks. If I’ve learned anything in my digital media career, it’s never to bet against the house.

Thanks, Julia. I’ll see everyone tomorrow. 

Matt

Need help? Review our
FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.

You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with . To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.

Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St., New York, NY 10006